Suspension of judgment not as an absence of critical thought, but as suspending value judgments is critical (Bohm, 1996). According to Krishnamurti, individuals must drop their personae, the masks they wear, in order for dialogue to emerge (Boga, 2004). Bohm is clear that the suspension of judgment does not mean that one gives up their identity or individualities, but that space is made for new ideas to emerge.

As I mentioned previously, Fisher and Ury’s (1981) “principled negotiation” includes the strategies to separate people from the problem and to focus on interests which both seem to be related to the criteria of re-humanizing the other and suspending judgment.

Suspension in Bohm’s dialogue is dynamism of thought. Space is created in which not only is the other allowed to exist, but the self is allowed to change. Finally, the notion that dialogue is “without sides” suggests the idea of suspension of judgment of self and others: “You relax your certainty and listen to the possibilities that result simply from being in relationship with others …” (Isaacs,1999a, p19).

Posted by John Bell on December 10, 2006
Tags: The Fifth Principle of Dialogue

Total comments on this page: 1

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)


No comments yet.

[…] brain”, I find this paradigmatic liminality to also have resonance with the notion of suspension in dialogue and Bey’s notion of an autonomous zone […]

April 1, 2010 2:30 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.